Aspec Themes to Use in Stories

Image description: A scene from the Star Trek: Voyager episode "Author, Author", in which The Doctor pens an overdramatic holonovel about his life and experiences. If I wrote a holonovel about my own life, it might not be as dramatic as The Doctor's, but it would probably include a few themes you can find in a lot of asexual and/or aromantic spectrum stories. What are they and what makes them special? Your mileage may vary, but here are a few themes I think are identifiable as aspec.

Quite often on the blog, there are repeated patterns I go back to over and over again – patterns which I usually identify in a few core characters who feature a great deal in my analysis. Sometimes, these patterns are somewhat cringeworthy, and I designate them as “negative tropes”. In fact, I have an entire oft-referenced “Tropes series” of posts, in which I attempted to zero in on these repeated patterns and quantify them in order to break them down. Beyond these troublesome tropes, however, there are plenty of themes that are more benign and act as similarities shared between these characters, despite their many differences. These are things that jump out to me as an aspec person, and may even be recognizable as something I myself may have experienced during my own journey, making them interesting things to consider when I look for aspec characters in media.

However, something else that is common on the blog, due to asexual and/or aromantic representation being somewhat limited, is that I’m often analyzing characters that aren’t explicitly aspec; in fact, some of them are later proved to not be asexual/aromantic/other related identities at all. So, rather than analyzing them based on irrefutable proof, I am analyzing them based on the so-called “aspec vibes” they present. What that means will doubtless be different depending on circumstances, the media the characters appear in, their own personality or how they’re written, etc. But despite these differences, the reason why I key in on certain characters as having those vibes is because of the recognizable themes they may present and the overlap these themes have when compared to other characters.

Because many characters with aspec vibes are sadly victims to aphobic tropes or negative stereotypes, it’s quite refreshing when more positive themes and elements present themselves, or when certain themes allow us to more fully understand and sympathize with a character. So today, I thought it would be interesting to look at a few themes that often jump out at me during my analysis. These are character traits and plot elements that I notice with some of my favorite headcanon aspec characters – in fact, in many cases, they’re some of the things that made me headcanon these characters that way in the first place, or at the very least, made me start thinking of them as identifiable. In other cases, they are canon asexual characters whose stories involve these elements as key factors in their journey to embracing themselves more fully. But regardless of who the characters are or what the rest of their story is like, I believe looking at these elements can allow people of all kinds to think deeply about these characters, their stories, and their struggles in new and meaningful ways.

Spoiler warning! 

Star Trek: The Next Generation
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
Star Trek: Voyager
BBC's Merlin
Stranger Things

-------------------------------------------------------

Names

Although the theme of names is not explicitly aspec in nature, I’m often surprised by how many aspec characters struggle with their names and, by extension, their identities. I think it’s because names are such a fundamental part of who we are and how we relate to each other/the world around us; thus, what others call us versus how we refer to ourselves tends to be a natural feature in stories about people trying to determine who they are. Of course, this is also central when it comes to figuring out something like identity, and so I’ve seen the theme of names come up several times for canon asexual characters, as well as characters that give me those elusive “aspec vibes.”

To start, there are numerous examples of this when it comes to Star Trek characters I’ve discussed before on the blog, including Data, Odo, Seven of Nine, and The Doctor. In Star Trek: The Next Generation, Data’s humanity is often called into question, which results in things like people calling him “it” rather than “him,” or by not using his name correctly. There is probably no better example of the latter than Doctor Pulaski’s first appearance in season two, during which she erroneously pronounces his name as Dah-tah, rather than Day-tah, and then fails to see why it’s a problem. When she laughingly asks, “what’s the difference?” Data replies, “one is my name, the other is not.”

Image description: Data and Dr. Pulaski from Star Trek: The Next Generation

In Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, meanwhile, we have Odo, whose name comes from a word meaning “nothing.” This is because his species (the Changelings) reverts to a liquid state, and thus when he was first discovered, it was legitimately unknown what he was; the words “unknown sample” got translated as “nothing.” But even after the scientists who found him came to realize he was a sentient lifeform, they still referred to him using this word, apparently not seeing any problem in it. Even worse, Odo thinks of this story as “amusing,” something which becomes even sadder when you consider that him finding it to be so probably stems from the fact that no one saw fit to give him a name or encourage him to find one for himself, so even he doesn't see it as a problem.

In Star Trek: Voyager, we see the theme of names very obviously present in both Ex-Borg drone Seven of Nine and in the ship’s holographic doctor, who never chooses a name for himself at all. In the case of the former, Seven began her life as a human girl named Annika Hansen, but when she was assimilated into the Borg Collective, she was given the wordy designation of “Seven of Nine, tertiary adjunct of Unimatrix Zero-One.” This string of numbers indicates her role within the cybernetic race, which strips individuality away from people and makes them part of the vast hivemind. In this case, losing one’s name is a very clear example of losing one’s sense of self, but I find it interesting that when she becomes human again, others are quick to force her former name back upon her, despite the fact that it doesn’t seem to fit her anymore.

Seven herself wants to keep using “Seven of Nine” as her name, but experiences some initial pushback, until Voyager’s crew eventually compromises and settles on the nickname of “Seven.” Although she eventually comes to embrace this nickname, it’s clearly chosen because it makes the crew more comfortable and they find it more accessible than calling her by even the shortened part of her Borg designation. Furthermore, there are several episodes in which it becomes something of a sticking point that Seven doesn’t want to use the name Annika anymore. For instance, there are several things I dislike about the episode “Unimatrix Zero,” one being the fact that Seven is shamed by the people in the Borg-dream world that gives this episode its title when she refers to herself as Seven of Nine rather than Annika.

In many instances, Seven’s name becomes a clear boundary line between who she used to be and who she becomes during her time with the crew of Voyager, as well as representing the pressure to become something she isn’t – in this case, something and someone more recognizably human. This same pressure is also faced by the ship’s doctor, although in his case it’s somewhat more self-imposed. As a hologram originally built for use in emergencies, The Doctor doesn’t have a name; he is originally designated simply as “the EMH,” short for “emergency medical hologram.” However, because circumstances necessitate that he be active all the time, he tries to think of a name and often comes up empty for one reason or another. While The Doctor himself is certainly the least aspec of the characters I’ve mentioned here (ironic, considering his original program literally doesn't have sex, sexuality, or sex organs included), it’s still interesting to see how the themes of name and identity come into play for him.

Of course, all these examples share an obvious similarity: they are non-human characters. However, the theme of names is not just used for non-human characters with aspec vibes, but also for human ones. In fact, this is something I’ve noticed comes up a great deal in many of the ace books I’ve read and reviewed for the blog – whether intentionally or unintentionally. Again, I think this is because names are intrinsically tied to our identity and, often times, getting to our true identity requires stripping away artificial things the world has given us, which may include a name. For instance, I’m reminded of many of the characters in Nicole Kornher-Stace’s books, such as the main character of the Archivist Wasp novels. Part of Wasp growing and maturing is achieved through abandoning this moniker she got as archivist and returning to her real name of Isabel. Likewise, the ghosts of the supersoldiers that she befriends have also had their names taken away, being known only by numbers during their lifetimes.

This theme can also show up as people’s names being misinterpreted. I was struck by a scene in the novel Tash Hearts Tolstoy by Kathryn Ormsbee where Tash’s internet crush (who turns out to be awful when she meets him) mispronounces her name several times in a way that Tash suspects might be deliberate. It puts me in mind of what I said earlier when referring to Data, and how his name was sometimes mispronounced, followed by this disrespect being dismissed as unimportant. In this way, I think names serve as a good metaphor or symbol for the concept of basic respect, which is part of what makes this theme so impactful when given to aspec characters or characters who have those tendencies.

In fact, I think one of the most impactful things about making names an element for aspec characters is the theme of being able to embrace a name and an identity in a new way. For instance, Odo embraces his name despite its origin and Seven makes her Borg designation her own symbol of embracing the duality of herself, and it feels like in so doing, they both embrace their own identities. As you likely know from my analysis, the writing of these shows doesn’t often let them stay in that place of acceptance, but I think these moments still serve as noteworthy reminders for us to overcome a lack of respect and continue to find meaning in our own identities. Of course, there are other ways where respecting differences and the struggles therein appear in media too, and these can apply to aspec characters in very meaningful ways we all can use to cultivate confidence in ourselves.

Being Unconventional

In various types of media, portraying a character as being “different” can be (and often is) used as a shorthand for various queer identities. The same can likewise be true for portraying characters who are aspec or are relatable from this lens, and this is something that many of the non-human characters mentioned above have in common. In their cases, they are unconventional primarily because they are not human, don’t understand certain elements of humanity, or have their own unique ways of doing things that often don’t fit into established norms. But just like the theme of names, we also can see this in human characters too.

For instance, a character I personally headcanon as being on the asexual and aromantic spectrums is the character of Morgana from the BBC series Merlin, a more family-friendly retelling of Arthurian Legend. A large part of why I headcanon Morgana this way is simple – she never has a single romantic relationship during the series, unlike many of the other characters, nor even a hint of one – but there are other elements of her personality and story that I feel lend themselves well to this belief. The main conflict of the show is the fact that Camelot strictly prohibits magic thanks to the tyrannical rule of Uther Pendragon, father of Prince Arthur and adoptive father of Lady Morgana. So, when Morgana begins exhibiting signs of magic, this is not only frightening for her, but serves to remove her from the friends and the support systems she’s relied upon her entire life. By having magic, she’s forced to adapt to a new reality and her struggles with this eventually cause her to shift from a caring and sympathetic protagonist to a cold-hearted villain.

I discussed Morgana a bit in my villains post, which postulates if being a villain can still be considered good representation, and mentioned that Morgana is an interesting example of this phenomenon because I feel the show never conflates the idea of her being non-sexual or non-romantic with the idea of being evil. Rather, the thing that really makes her evil is the fact that she is denied her true self – the self with magic – which is considered evil by the people of Camelot. This denial of her true self and the way it eventually warps who Morgana is and what she stands for is actually quite fascinating, especially when analyzed from an aspec lens. I believe it shows the struggle of being non-conventional in a world where being different is on par with being heretical.

Image description: Morgana, after her turn to villainy, in the BBC series Merlin

These are interesting themes to include because they have so much flexibility. In Morgana’s case, her non-conformity comes about because she has magic, but these themes can be explored in any number of ways. Another example of a character that isn’t explicitly aspec but nevertheless has interesting moments of characterization we can learn from is the character of Will Byers from Stranger Things. The series focuses on the bizarre and frightening happenings of a small town called Hawkins, but Will is a non-conventional outsider even before these strange occurrences. From the start, not only are Will and his friends established as nerds, but Will himself is often treated as less than by bullies and those who are stronger than him, who dismiss him as weak, frail, and “different.”

Later, Will becomes even more of an oddity to the people around him when his mysterious disappearance and return – thanks to the spooky forces of the alternate dimension known as the Upside Down – are treated almost as if he’s come back from the dead. Now dubbed “zombie boy” by the people in town, Will is treated as a “freak,” even more than he already was, which leads to him feeling apart from those around him. But even beyond the reactions of the people in Hawkins, Will does have some elements of himself that are different, both in the supernatural sense and in a more day-to-day sense. For the former, Will’s terrifying stay in the Upside Down leaves him with the unique ability to sense the antagonist that dwells there, as well as greater susceptibility to it; for the latter, Will is different even from his own friends in ways that are actually quite relatable.

As I discussed in my post specifically about Will, it’s extremely likely that Will is actually gay and that these moments that mark him as separate from his friends, outside of the norm, or just generally “different” are supposed to point us to this identity. But as I also mentioned in that post, the way this is portrayed does have some aspec parallels that, while perhaps not intentional, can teach us a thing or two about aspec portrayals nonetheless. The way Will is characterized as being unconventional – as a young man of his age, as a regular person, and even among his own friends and family – are all elements that can be used in portraying aspec characters if done well and respectfully.

Making a character markedly different from everyone else and experiencing the world in different ways yields tremendous storytelling potential, and can set characters up as being alone or lonely in ways that are not at all sexual and/or romantic, which can be the great first step in telling a good aspec story. This doesn’t have to be done in a cringey way or in a way that sets up the character as being better than the people around them; indeed, I think the point of portraying a character as unconventional is to show that these things often lead to them being treated as or feeling “less than.” From there, stories of all kinds can create tremendous potential for growth, and coming into understanding, acceptance, or self-love, depending on the case. Much like the theme of names, this can lead to an exploration of what it means to belong or be accepted, which leads nicely to another theme I find very interesting (and sometimes even comforting).

Seeking (and Finding?)

In many cases, aspec characters or characters that are recognizable from that perspective are searching for something. Sometimes, they’re even searching for something they know they won’t be able to find. For instance, Data in TNG knows that he, as an android, will never be human, but that doesn’t stop him from trying to seek humanity. Seven of Nine, meanwhile, seeks to figure out how she can be an individual while also adapting to a new Collective – in this case, Voyager. In many cases, these characters and their journeys can easily be described by saying they are journeys to find respect, understanding, and belonging.

To me, this is the most recognizable theme of the ones I’ve mentioned in this post. I personally have never struggled with my name (other than having a lot of screen names online), and, although I often discuss the ways I am different from those around me and can feel alienated as a result, I know I am lucky enough to have a lot more acceptance than other people have. As such, these other themes don’t hit me on quite as much of a personal level as this one does; indeed, this might be one of the biggest themes of my own life and journey as I’ve discussed before on my blog – including in a post literally called “Redefining Belonging.” Because our identities are still largely unrecognized and misrepresented, I think many aspec people are seeking to even just be understood and acknowledged, so this theme has always been an immediate way I flag characters I recognize or identify with.

Unfortunately, sometimes these characters’ journeys can be sadly mismanaged. For instance, the aforementioned struggle Seven goes through to exist as an individual is portrayed in ways heavily laden with amatonormativity, as is true of many of the characters I’ve mentioned in this post, especially the ones from various Star Trek series. But I believe these failures aren’t the fault of the theme itself, but rather the fault of more negative tropes and stereotypes that get added to this one. In my eyes, the theme of seeking respect, understanding, belonging, or other similar states of being is not a bad thing, and indeed can be richly and variously interpreted.

In fact, it’s not even automatically a bad thing if a character finds these things through a romance (some of my favorite romances are those based on mutual respect and understanding). The problem is when a story pushes romance and/or sex as the only way a character can find these things and the only acceptable path to pursue, which is what we see with many of my usual examples. But as I said, this particular theme can be extremely versatile, and it can be applied to characters in all sorts of unique ways that don’t have to follow amatonormative paths. Despite moments in their respective shows where I feel their characters are disrespected, Data, Seven, and Odo do give us examples of places where this theme can go well.

In Data’s case, I think of the moving scene in “The Offspring” where he teaches his daughter Lal about striving to be more, and that striving is its own reward. For Odo, my mind goes to an episode with a somewhat similar premise, “The Begotten.” In this episode, Odo finds an infant Changeling and through it is given the chance to accept all over again the things that are valuable and noteworthy about being different. When it comes to Seven of Nine, I immediately turn to a scene in the episode “One” where Seven must affirm that she can adapt to becoming an individual and can survive, even if she is on her own. All three episodes are examples of these characters seeking their own unique forms of individuation and acceptance – whether from their peers or from themselves – and these can be very aspec themes, especially when coupled with the other vibes we see from these particular characters.

With that said, you may wonder why I put “finding” in parentheses and paired it with a question mark in this section’s heading, and there are two answers. The first is that, often times in stories, this theme of seeking is never fleshed out enough for a conclusion to actually be reached; the second is that many times the journey is framed much like it is for Data, where the seeking part is unending because the ability to attain the goal may be impossible, and indeed in my own life I sometimes wonder if finding is ever actually possible as well. In many instances, I think using the theme of seeking is enough and that finding isn’t actually necessary in the narrative precisely because people will each have their own definitions of what “finding” these things actually is, or they may accept that these are ongoing journeys without real endings.

However, the question mark is also there to represent my ongoing wonder if it is indeed possible to find these things in real life and in media. I think we’re starting to see more instances where aspec characters are allowed to find the things they’re looking for, whatever that might mean, and where the road, no matter how bumpy, does in fact reach a conclusion that offers some satisfaction and hope. As I’ve mentioned in other posts, our real lives don’t often have endings as tidy as the endings for characters in a story might be, so it can be hard to ever fully say we’ve accomplished a goal or conclusion. But stories where aspec characters can find what they’re seeking could potentially have the power to help people of all kinds keep going, which is why I believe these themes have tremendous power and should be explored/embraced more in storytelling, given to actual aspec characters who are allowed to exist in recognizably aspec ways.

Image description: Odo with the infant Changeling in the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine episode "The Begotten"

Overall, there are so many things that can make a character feel meaningful to an aspec person – and, because these identities are varied and there is no universal experience, those things are likely to be incredibly different depending on who you talk to. Even so, I hope these few themes that I pointed out here serve as thought-provoking examples of those elusive “aspec vibes.” Whether these themes are something viewers want to keep an eye out for in their favorite media or something writers might want to include in their stories about aspec characters, I personally think they can serve as great jumping off points for further analysis and interpretation.

It will likely take a long time to deconstruct negative tropes and stereotypes about aspec identities, and some of them may never go away entirely. But if we have more positive themes we can embrace, we can offer an alternate interpretation of these stories and teach better lessons. It might not be simple or uniform, but even just thinking deeply about what these identities might want or need to see, or what stories these characters can tell, can create more positive representation. And with better representation comes better stories, not just for aspec people, but for everyone – stories that everyone, regardless of identity, can enjoy.

Comments

Popular Posts